Re: V6 still not supported

["Abraham Y. Chen" <aychen () avinta com>]

Hi, Owen:

The EzIP addresses (the 240/4 netblock) are proposed to be treated as 
"natural resources" without a price tag (or, "free") following the 
old-fashioned PSTN discipline, instead of "personal properties" for 
auction according to the current Internet way.

Regards,


Abe (2022-04-01 09:35)



On 2022-03-31 16:09, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 2022, at 08:09 , Jared Brown<nanog-isp () mail com>  wrote:
> >
> > Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> > > > > When your ISP starts charging $X/Month for legacy protocol support
> > > > Out of interest, how would this come about?
> > > ISPs are facing ever growing costs to continue providing IPv4 services.
> >   Could you please be more specific about which costs you are referring to?
> Costs of address acquisition
> Costs of CGNAT systems in lieu of address acquisition costs
> Costs of increasing support calls due to IPv4 life support measures in other networks.
> etc.
>
> >   It's not like IP transit providers care if they deliver IPv4 or IPv6 bits to you.
> True, but adding customers requires additional addresses at some point. IPv6 addresses are cheap compared to IPv4 
> addresses.
>
> Owen


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus