nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 19:03:46 +0200
On 9/5/21 18:22, Bjørn Mork wrote:
I believe this is slowly sinking in among the technology evangelists and geeks who managed to drive the half-assed dual-stack transition a decade or two ago. No one will argue for dual-stack anymore. So where does that put us in a decade or two? Which protocol is optional?
You will join the IPv6 train whenever you do.I don't waste anymore time asking people to deploy it. I'm better off spending my time drinking wine.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Knight via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Xavier Beaudouin via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Matt Palmer (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)