nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 18:22:20 +0200
Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> writes:
I view IPv6 as the biggest mistake of my career and feel responsible for this horrible outcome and I do apologise to Internet users for it. This dual-stack is the worst possible outcome, and we've been here over two decades, increasing cost and reducing service quality. We should have performed better, we should have been IPv6 only years ago.
I believe this is slowly sinking in among the technology evangelists and geeks who managed to drive the half-assed dual-stack transition a decade or two ago. No one will argue for dual-stack anymore. So where does that put us in a decade or two? Which protocol is optional? Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Justin Streiner (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Knight via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Xavier Beaudouin via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Matt Palmer (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 06)