nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Jeroen Massar via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 23:09:45 +0200
On 2021-09-04 23:02, Ryan Hamel wrote:
Jeroen,> You people keep on giving money to ISPs that are not providing the service you want.Not everyone has the luxury of picking their ISP,
But this list is NANOG.... Network Operators. We are the ISPs....
and the common consumer doesn't know or care about IPv6.
And they indeed should not have to care. Good that this is not a consumer list, or a ISP complaint line (though, I guess complaining about peering or broken connectivity is in the charter)
They want Netflix to work and that's it.
They thus have no need for IPv6, which was the question...Netflix works mostly fine over IPv4 (or heck CGN as that is what one is likely headed to if your ISP did not get chunks of free IPv4 address space), it is actually still IPv6 where they sometimes have a few PMTU blackholes... ;) [though, have not noticed one in a while now]
Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Ryan Hamel (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Justin Streiner (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Knight via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Ryan Hamel (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 04)