nanog mailing list archives
Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:51:31 -0400
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:12:51 +0200, Mark Tinka said:
I should have said "If you don't plan to run a full BGP table on a device without a default a route as well,
Am I insufficently caffienated, or is uRPF the least of your problems if you don't have a full table *and* don't have a default route?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: uPRF strict more, (continued)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Message not available
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Anoop Ghanwani (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Baldur Norddahl (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Andrew Smith (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Sabri Berisha (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Saku Ytti (Sep 30)
- RE: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)