nanog mailing list archives
Re: uPRF strict more
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:00:55 +0200
On 9/29/21 23:36, Anoop Ghanwani wrote:
This is not true for all ASICs. Some ASICs choose to incur the penalty in a different way, e.g., by halving the prefix tables. The prefix table is then duplicated so that uRPF SA and forwarding DA lookups can happen in parallel. What kind of penalty is incurred is a question worth asking the equipment vendor.
Agree with this - the implementation can vary between vendors and between hardware.
Best to test your specific platform, to be sure. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: uPRF strict more, (continued)
- Re: uPRF strict more Sabri Berisha (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Blake Hudson (Sep 30)
- Re: uPRF strict more Adam Thompson (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Phil Bedard (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Message not available
- RE: uPRF strict more Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Anoop Ghanwani (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Baldur Norddahl (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more brad dreisbach (Sep 29)
- Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Andrew Smith (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Sabri Berisha (Sep 30)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Saku Ytti (Sep 30)