nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 19 Sep 2021 23:47:12 -0400
It appears that Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net> said:
or get an HE /48 over a tunnel which will do PTR or NS records appropriately.Hurricane Electric? Seriously?
I've been using HE's free ipv6 tunnels for ten years. They work great. I don't ever recall any downtime. They assign you a /64 by default, /48 on request, and delegate the rDNS wherever you want. One points at my server which is in a rack somewhere, one points at the router on my home fiber connection. Since I set it up they filter port 25 by default for obvious reasons but will unblock if you ask nicely and sound like you know what you're doing. Geolocation doesn't work, and now and then someone (Wikipedia) decides it's an evil VPN and blocks or filters it but I haven't found that to be much of a problem in practice. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Doug McIntyre (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Stephen Satchell (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 19)