nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 19 Sep 2021 02:31:29 -0000
According to Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>:
It tells you that AT&T donât treat IPv6 on equal footing to IPv4 and nothing more.
Indeed but since AT&T is about 1/4 of the US broadband market, and our screwed up telco politics means there is often no practical competitor available, that's a big problem. R's, John PS: that's separate from what he said about equipment which nomninally has v6 support but not in a way that you can actually use. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Doug McIntyre (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Stephen Satchell (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 19)