nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 08:47:50 -0700
On Sep 13, 2021, at 05:17 , Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: On 9/13/21 01:00, Michael Thomas wrote:If vendors actually cared they could make the CGNAT's and other hacks ridiculously buggy and really expensive to deploy and maintain. I doubt many vendors were chomping at the bit to support CGNAT and are probably wondering what fresh hell is next to keep ipv4 limping along.10's of millions of dollars being spent by African mobile operators, every year, in CG-NAT hardware and licenses, with the vendors. They will make sure that code is bug-free :-).
ROFLMAO 100s of millions of dollars are spent every year on major backbone router kit. That code has never been bug free. Your assertion is provably false. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Carsten Bormann (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bill Woodcock (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Fred Baker (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 19)