nanog mailing list archives

Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast


From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:58:57 -0800


On 11/19/21 10:15 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:04 AM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
I don't think you can overstate how ASIC's made changing anything pretty
much impossible.
It's why all of the pissing and moaning about what ipv6 looked like
completely missed the point. There was a fuse lit in 1992 to when the
first hardware based routing was done. *Anything* that extended the
address space would have been better.
Obligatory 2007 plug: https://bill.herrin.us/network/ipxl.html


And just as impossible since it would pop it out of the fast path. Does big iron support ipv6 these days?

Mike


Current thread: