nanog mailing list archives
Re: Past policies versus present and future uses
From: Rob McEwen <rob () invaluement com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:39:28 -0500
On 1/25/2021 11:34 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
They are not losing IPs because of hosting questionable content.
Correct - but from reading the Brian Krebs article on this, that was the justification that Ron Guilmette used for going after Parler and DDoS-Guard.
-- Rob McEwen https://www.invaluement.com +1 (478) 475-9032
Current thread:
- Re: Nice work Ron, (continued)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron John Sage (Jan 24)
- Past policies versus present and future uses Matthew Petach (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses John Sage (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rubens Kuhl (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rich Kulawiec (Jan 26)
- Re: Nice work Ron Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron Mark Andrews (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron George Herbert (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron Alain Hebert (Jan 21)
- Re: Nice work Ron Ethan (Jan 21)