nanog mailing list archives
Re: Past policies versus present and future uses
From: Rob McEwen <rob () invaluement com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:32:06 -0500
/(sent again since the last one had the inline graphic stripped out - so this one links to the graphic on a website)/
A take on the 1979 movie "When A Stranger Calls" - "have you checked the children?" becomes "have you checked the IP registration?"
Have you checked the IP registration? https://www.invaluement.com/have-you-checked-the-ip-registration.jpgThe vast majority of the time, Ron Guilmette does "the Lord's work" - but THIS time - it looks to me like he put his political biases ahead of legit anti-abuse, and it's no surprise that we now have a trail of destruction left behind, along with much "innocent bystander" collateral damage.
Is DDoS-Guard without blame? Probably not, but them hosting some occasional criminals is NOT UNLIKE EVERY OTHER GLOBAL NETWORK! So like other large and diversity global networks, anti abuse should focus on removing their worst criminals/spammers. By these SAME standards, many other large and famous networks should lose most or much of their IPs too!
So here we are, with many OTHER networks now legitimately freaked out about losing their IPs, and with massive potential collateral damage that might hurt many "innocent bystanders" each time that is done!
-- Rob McEwen, invaluement
Current thread:
- Re: Nice work Ron, (continued)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron John Sage (Jan 24)
- Past policies versus present and future uses Matthew Petach (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses John Sage (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rubens Kuhl (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rich Kulawiec (Jan 26)
- Re: Nice work Ron Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron Mark Andrews (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron George Herbert (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron Alain Hebert (Jan 21)
- Re: Nice work Ron Ethan (Jan 21)