Re: Parler

["K. Scott Helms" <kscott.helms () gmail com>]

This is a list for pushing bits.  The fact that many/most of us have other
businesses doesn't make this an appropriate forum for SIP issues (to use my
own work as an example).

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 4:52 PM <sronan () ronan-online com> wrote:

> This is a list for Network Operators, AWS certainly operates networks.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:27 PM, K. Scott Helms <kscott.helms () gmail com>
> wrote:
>
> 
> No,
>
> It really does not.  Section 230 only applies to publishers, and not to
> network providers.  If this were a cloud hosting provider list then you'd
> be correct, but as a network provider's list it does not belong here.
>
>
> Scott Helms
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM Lady Benjamin PD Cannon <ben () 6by7 net>
> wrote:
>
> > As network operations and compute/cloud/hosting operations continue to
> > coalesce, I very much disagree with you.  Section 230 is absolutely
> > relevant, this discussion is timely and relevant, and it directly affects
> > me as both a telecom and cloud compute/services provider.
> >
> >
> > —L.B.
> >
> > Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE
> > 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
> > CEO
> > ben () 6by7 net
> > "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in
> > the world.”
> > FCC License KJ6FJJ
> >
> > <Speedtest9118.png>
> > <Ben LIC.png>
> >
> > On Jan 10, 2021, at 12:13 PM, K. Scott Helms <kscott.helms () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > It's not, and frankly it's disappointing to see people pushing an agenda
> > here.
> >
> >
> > Scott Helms
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:37 AM <sronan () ronan-online com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > NANOG is a group of Operators, discussion does not have to be about
> > networking. I have already explained how this represents a significant
> > issue for Network Operators.
> >
> > On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:09 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily
> > political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond speculative,
> > on how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing congestion or routing
> > issues on the public internet, then great. But as of now, that isn't even a
> > thing. It's just best to leave it alone because it will devolve into chaos.
> >
> > - Mike Bolitho
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 6:54 AM <sronan () ronan-online com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not political
> > at all.
> >
> > On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins?
> >
> > - Mike Bolitho
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in
> > search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the
> > proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function.
> >
> >
> > https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bill HErrin