nanog mailing list archives
Re: Parler
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:31:59 -0800
On 1/10/21 10:24 AM, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
The real point of the tool was to capture all of those architectural features so they could be compared and contrasted. Some of them are fungible, some of them are not. Knowing the non-fungible ones gives you a window into lock ins.Peace, On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:18 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:At my previous job, I built a tool which could spin up a server farm given a platform agnostic design spec from a list of vendors as well as pricing it out. It was really more of a prototype since it only supported Chef on the spin-up side, but it showed that you could move things pretty quickly if need be.That's not just the provisioning, you also need an independent cluster management and scheduling (hence Nomad). But yes.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Parler, (continued)
- Re: Parler Mike Bolitho (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler K. Scott Helms (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Mark Tinka (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Mark Tinka (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Shivaram Mysore (Jan 10)