nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:03:55 +0100
Is the DoD still the owner? On Sun 25 Apr 2021 at 10:24, Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:
On Apr 25, 2021, at 9:40 AM, Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:It’s a direct militarization of a civilian utility.I think I’d characterize it, rather, as a possible privatization of public property.If someone builds a house in the middle of a public park, it’s not _what they’re doing in the house_ that concerns me.-Bill
--Christian de Larrinaga https://firsthand.net
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 26)
- RE: DoD IP Space Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Apr 26)
- RE: DoD IP Space Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Michael Thomas (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Foster (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bill Woodcock (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Foster (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space sronan (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Michael Butler via NANOG (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)