nanog mailing list archives
Re: antispamcloud.com (SpamExperts) forensics reports format
From: John Levine via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: 9 Sep 2020 14:51:20 -0400
In article <120a24d4e0da4f2392a25a8140be2a9d () ex1 obs.local> you write:
We are parsing dmarc reports using parsedmarc and the forensics reports coming from antispamcloud.com seems not to follow the recommended reporting format (AFRF) and therefore are considered invalid.
You're right, they're not following the DMARC spec that says the reports are sent in multipart/report ARF format. Followups to the mailop list, where people who know about this stuff are likely to read them. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Current thread:
- antispamcloud.com (SpamExperts) forensics reports format Sébastien Riccio via NANOG (Sep 09)
- Re: antispamcloud.com (SpamExperts) forensics reports format John Levine via NANOG (Sep 09)