nanog mailing list archives
Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 04:21:51 +0200
On 20/Mar/20 15:51, Mike Hammett wrote:
Why in the world would they do that? Maybe waive the fees for the higher services, but you're not entitled to anything more than that.
Users will pay for value. If users don't see value, they will respond accordingly. Mark.
Current thread:
- RE: COVID-19 vs. our Networks, (continued)
- RE: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Keith Medcalf (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Hammett (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Hammett (Mar 21)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- RE: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Keith Medcalf (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mel Beckman (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Hammett (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Tom Beecher (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Tom Beecher (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Tom Beecher (Mar 19)
- COVID-19 vs. peering wars Matthew Petach (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Matt Erculiani (Mar 19)
- RE: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Sadiq Saif (Mar 20)
- RE: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Adam Thompson (Mar 20)