nanog mailing list archives
Re: COVID-19 vs. peering wars
From: Matt Erculiani <merculiani () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:17:31 -0600
Interesting thought, Matt. I've emailed both of my Senators to inform them of this issue and its potential impact on the resiliency of the internet (the most infamous culprit being an operator of root DNS servers, to name a specific example). I would encourage every NANOG member who cares about this issue to do the same. It may be a shot in the dark, but it's a start I guess... -Matt On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:15 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:27 AM Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho () gmail com> wrote:*Restoration:* *The repair or returning to service of one or more telecommunications services that have experienced a service outage or are unusable for any reason, including a damaged or impaired telecommunications facility. Such repair or returning to service may be done by patching, rerouting, substitution of component parts or pathways, and other means, as determined necessary by a service vendor.* https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OEC%20TSP%20Operations%20Guide%20Final%2012062016_FINAL%20508C.pdf My understanding, and what we did while I worked for a Tier I ISP, was that even for degraded circuits we had to do everything in our power to restore to full operations. If capacity is an issue and causes TSP coded DIA circuits to be unusable then that falls under the "any reason" clause of that line. - Mike BolithoIf you're going to bang that drum, the place you're going to get the most buck-for-your-bang is using it to force better cooperation between ISPs. It appears that baking cakes was not sufficient to get recalcitrant players to work together. https://www.flickr.com/photos/mpetach/4031195041 Perhaps a global pandemic may be sufficient to have government begin to *compel* networks to interconnect at locations at which they share common peering infrastructure? If you're worried about congestion and performance, that would be the place to start pushing. Matt staying safely at home away from the flame-fest that may ensue from this. ^_^;
-- Matt Erculiani ERCUL-ARIN
Current thread:
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks, (continued)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mel Beckman (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Hammett (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Tom Beecher (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Tom Beecher (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mike Bolitho (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Tom Beecher (Mar 19)
- COVID-19 vs. peering wars Matthew Petach (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Matt Erculiani (Mar 19)
- RE: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Sadiq Saif (Mar 20)
- RE: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Adam Thompson (Mar 20)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- RE: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Adam Thompson (Mar 23)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. peering wars Bradley Huffaker (Mar 23)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 19)
- Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks Mark Tinka (Mar 19)