nanog mailing list archives
Re: UDP/123 policers & status
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:10:47 +0200
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 18:05, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
Yeh, not changing ipv4 filters, Sorry pool. Burned once, twice shy.
On many edge routers from Juniper, Nokia and Cisco you can create offset based bit-matches. I'm NTP illiterate, but isn't NTP mode in fixed offset after UDP header? So it should be possible to do this in hardware at linerate just the same as matching UDP port on typical edge router. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- UDP/123 policers & status Jared Mauch (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Compton, Rich A (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ca By (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Steven Sommars (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ca By (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Damian Menscher via NANOG (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Damian Menscher via NANOG (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ca By (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Steven Sommars (Mar 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Hal Murray (Mar 23)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 27)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti (Mar 27)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 29)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 27)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Roland Dobbins (Mar 28)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Bottiger (Mar 28)