Re: WIKI documentation Software?

["Grimes, Greg" <greg.grimes () msstate edu>]

I know I'm a bit late to the conversation.  We have been using PMWiki for well over 10 yrs now.  At the time we started 
using it there weren't a lot of Wikis out there.  MediaWiki obviously was the most popular, but it did not provide the 
level of secure access that we wanted.  We didn't want everyone to be able to edit certain pages.  It was also very 
easy to integrate into CAS.  I wrote a cookbook for it years ago.  We use groups to allow only certain people to edit 
certain pages.  We also restrict viewing of some pages.  Our Security Group keeps some of their stuff restricted.  I 
work for the network team and we prevent everyone but our team from editing our pages.  They can view them, just can't 
mess with them.  Hope this helps someone.

https://www.pmwiki.org/


--

Greg T. Grimes
Senior Network Analyst
Information Technology Services
Mississippi State University
greg.grimes () msstate edu
662-325-9311

________________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Yang Yu <yang.yu.list () gmail com>
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2020 06:59
To: Brielle
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: WIKI documentation Software?

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 7:07 AM Brielle <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:
> I personally like Dokuwiki a lot.
>
> From a usability standpoint, once you spend a few learning the interface, it’s very simplistic and not overwhelming 
> in features.  You can always add extensions for stuff you need that isn’t there out of box.
>
> From a technical standpoint, it doesn’t need a database.  The entire structure is text files, so it can be run on 
> even a super small VM, and doing backups is as easy as tarballing the data directory.
>
> It’s got support for LDAP for authentication too, which might be useful.

+1 for dokuwiki

easy to maintain, has enough features while not become distracting

only complaint is that it doesn't support markdown, but the syntax is
easy enough (much easier than MediaWiki imo)