nanog mailing list archives

Re: WIKI documentation Software?


From: Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 23:14:28 +0530

+1 for Dokuwiki as well as Gitlab.

I personally like Gitlab but fact that wiki is on per project basis. It is
easy to use Dokuwiki as a general purpose, project independent wiki.



On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 9:20 PM Ray Orsini <ray () oit co> wrote:

Confluence is good for small teams. Self-hosted is $10r. Plus addons we
end up around $150/yr. Unfortunately, we outgrew it in terms of users.
Additional users are way too expensive.



[image: OIT Website] <https://www.oit.co/>

*Ray Orsini**​*

*Chief Executive Officer*

*OIT, LLC*

 305.967.6756 x1009 <305.967.6756%20x1009>

 |

 305.571.6272

 ray () oit co

 |

<https://www.oit.co/>

 www.oit.co <https://www.oit.co/>

 oit.co/ray

[image: Facebook] <https://go.oit.co/facebook>

[image: LinkedIn] <https://go.oit.co/linkedin>

[image: Twitter] <https://go.oit.co/twitter>

[image: YouTube] <https://go.oit.co/youtube>

*How are we doing? We'd love to hear your feedback. https://go.oit.co/review
<https://go.oit.co/review>*



*From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> *On Behalf Of *Craig
*Sent:* Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:34 AM
*To:* Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas () gmail com>; nanog group <nanog () nanog org>
*Subject:* Re: WIKI documentation Software?





Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen ,



We’ve managed to avoid using that.









On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas () gmail com>
wrote:

Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint.



On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig <cvuljanic () gmail com> wrote:

Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to
/ how to's for staff, etc.



pro's

con's



We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced
before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones.



thanks;



CPV







-- 


Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com

Current thread: