nanog mailing list archives

Re: Tell me about AS19111


From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg () tristatelogic com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 16:30:45 -0800

In message <24124.30737.599536.809689 () gargle gargle HOWL>, 
Sandra Murphy <sandy () tislabs com> wrote:

It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I
suggested.

For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it
a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be implying a
number like that) being abused.

Do we have that number?

I suggested that nobody has that number, to any degree of accuracy,
as of today.

Once again, this is something that I would be happy to be proven
wrong about.


Regards,
rfg


Current thread: