Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

[Paul Timmins <paul () telcodata us>]

It's okay though, because we freed up UDP/53 by moving DNS to TCP/443, 
so then we can move HTTPS to UDP/53.

On 2/21/20 6:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> First we moved the entire internet to TCP/443.
>
> Now we propose moving it all to UDP/53.
>
> What’s next? Why not simply eliminate port numbers altogether in favor 
> of a single 16-bit client-side unique session identifier.
>
> Owen
>
> > On Feb 21, 2020, at 15:20 , Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com 
> > <mailto:mpetach () netflight com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 13:31 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz () bromirski net 
> > <mailto:lukasz () bromirski net>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     [...]
> >
> >     Now… once we are aware, the only question is — where we go from here?
> >
> >     —
> >     ./
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, it's clear the UDP 443 experiment wasn't entirely successful.
> >
> > So clearly, it's time to use the one UDP port that is allowed through 
> > at the top of everyone's ACL rules, and update QUIC in the next 
> > iteration to use UDP/53.
> >
> > *THAT* should solve the whole problem, once and for all.
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > Matt