nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:00:20 +0200
On 26/Aug/20 20:38, Brian Johnson wrote:
I‘m going further... They shouldn’t have to care. Sony should understand what they are delivering and the circumstance of that. That they refuse to serve some customers due to the technology they use is either a business decision or a faulty design. The end-customer (gamer) doesn’t care. They just want to play.
Sony know that when connectivity breaks because they marked a NAT444'ed IP address as a DDoS source, the end-user won't complain to Sony (that's a customer service blackhole). The end-user will complain to the ISP. Chain of responsibility is in the ISP's disfavour. Sony don't have to do anything. It's like sending an e-mail to an abuse@ mail box. You sort of know it won't get answered, and are powerless if it isn't answered. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- RE: Ipv6 help Tony Wicks (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)