nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:57:24 +0200
On 20/Apr/20 18:50, Tom Beecher wrote:
Work on a technical level, yes. But there are legal concerns in the ARIN region with that, some of which are spelled out here, by ACTUAL lawyers. https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG75/1900/20190219_Yoo_Rpki_Legal_Barriers_v1.pdf Not going to dive any further into that subject here, wrong forum, but it's illustrative of my overall point. Thar Were Dragons still to be slayed on this topic already, and I think CF has just made that harder.
I (and Ben, and a few others) are all too familiar with the ARIN madness around their TAL. Simple - we just don't accept it, which means our networks will be unsafe against North American resources. Highly doubtful my organization is that interested in how the ARIN region may or may not impact our interest in deploying RPKI on this side of the planet, when the rest of the world are less mad about it :-). This policy was broken in 2014. And it's still broken in 2020. Ah well... we keep moving. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test, (continued)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Cummings, Chris (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Tom Beecher (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Tom Beecher (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Denys Fedoryshchenko (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Rubens Kuhl (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Denys Fedoryshchenko (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 20)