nanog mailing list archives
RE: Mx204 alternative
From: <adamv0025 () netconsultings com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:11:17 +0100
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 9:55 AM On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 10:27, Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz () bromirski net> wrote:64B traffic simply doesn’t happen apart from DDoS scenarios, so why bother at all? Customers anyway want to use dedicatedAnd like you said, QoS and filters usually have 0 pps cost.
Not true. This is the case only in fixed pipelines. adam
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative, (continued)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Ross Tajvar (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Raymond Burkholder (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Olivier Benghozi (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Łukasz Bromirski (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Nick Hilliard (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)