nanog mailing list archives

Re: Mx204 alternative

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 12:26:52 +0200



On 2/Sep/19 11:24, Aled Morris wrote:



Sorry I have no inside info, only what's been released publicly.


We stayed away from the ACX5000 because the Broadcom chip in there
wasn't great for high-touch services.

I hope this ACX700 has a better plan.

Mark.

Current thread:

Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Hank Nussbacher (Sep 02)
  - Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Aled Morris via NANOG (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Aled Morris via NANOG (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Gavin Henry (Sep 02)
    - RE: Mx204 alternative Phil Lavin (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative tim () pelican org (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Butterworth (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Kenneth McRae via NANOG (Sep 02)
    - Re: Mx204 alternative Kenneth McRae via NANOG (Sep 02)
  - Re: Mx204 alternative Rob Foehl (Sep 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
  - Re: Mx204 alternative Bjørn Mork (Sep 02)

(Thread continues...)