nanog mailing list archives
Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond)
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg () tristatelogic com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:52:53 -0700
In message <VI1PR1001MB1294743A032DB4F595901579D68F0@VI1PR1001MB1294.EURPRD10.P ROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io> wrote:
Please see the following link: https://afrinic.net/resource-certification As you can see, a MyAFRINIC account is required. Yes, route objects for legacy AFRINIC resources in their RIR operated IRRDB as a fallback for RPKI can be created and they were created by us.
What Mr. Cohen continues to dance around is the inconvenient truth that even if he had an AFRINIC account, this would neither help nor explain his thefts of the several AFRINIC -and- APNIC region blocks that I have already listed here. RIPE Routing History reveals the truth, for anyone who wishes to consult that historical data, and I also have plenty of saved traceroutes for each of those APNIC blocks, as well as all of the others that Mr. Cohen stole from the AFRINIC region. Those were all helpfully routed, until quite recently, to Mr. Cohen, and by Mr. Cohen's dear friends at FDCServers and Cogent. Come now Mr. Cohen, please do tell us who you paid for rights to the 168.198.0.0/16 block, which belongs to the Australian government, and which your pals at Cogent and FDCServers were routing to you until quite recently. Who did you pay and how much did you pay for your "rights" to the City of Cape Town's 165.25.0.0/16 block? It's OK. No need to be shy. Show us the your sales reciepts for those blocks please! We could all use a good laugh today. Alternatively, if you can't or won't show us that, then at least have the decency to admit that you're a liar, a fraud, and a con man, and that until I caught you, you were stealing all of the IPv4 space that wasn't nailed down in both the AFRINIC region and the APNIC region. Did you seriously think that you could get away with all this and that nobody would even notice? If so, then you're even dumber that you look in all of the online pictures of you I've seen. Regards, rfg
Current thread:
- Re: RPKI (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond), (continued)
- Re: RPKI (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Sep 17)
- Registration fraud (was Re: RPKI) Masataka Ohta (Sep 18)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Elad Cohen (Sep 18)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Sep 17)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Christopher Morrow (Sep 17)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 17)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Christopher Morrow (Sep 17)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Carlos Friaças via NANOG (Sep 17)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Elad Cohen (Sep 18)
- Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Ronald F. Guilmette (Sep 18)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Job Snijders (Sep 18)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Ben Cannon (Sep 18)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Ronald F. Guilmette (Sep 19)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) niels=nanog (Sep 19)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Ronald F. Guilmette (Sep 19)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) niels=nanog (Sep 24)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) Christopher Morrow (Sep 19)
- Re: Elad Cohen (was: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond) William Herrin (Sep 19)