Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:56 PM Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 9:46 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:46 PM Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
> > <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
> > > Hi Elad,
> > >
> > > Is this policy officially documented by AFRINIC somewhere? Can you make route objects for legacy AFRINIC resources 
> > > in their RIR operated IRRDB as a fallback for RPKI?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Martijn ________________________________
> > > From: Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io>
> > > Sent: 18 September 2019 00:40:13
> > > To: Martijn Schmidt <martijnschmidt () i3d net>; nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
> > > Subject: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
> > >
> > > Hello Martin, unfortunately RPKI is not yet technically possible for a legacy range in Afrinic.
> > > _
> >
> > technically possible to transfer your afrnic space to ripe though,
> > right? and do rpki there.
>
> I do not believe so.

oh :( bummer.

> AFRINIC has no inter-RIR transfer policy. I do not believe the fact it is legacy space matters, AFRINIC won’t let you 
> move it out, and RIPE wouldn’t let you bring it in anyway - AFAIK.
>
> They are the only RIR that does not have an inter-RIR policy. Well, LACNIC just voted one in, but it is not 
> implemented - yet.
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick