nanog mailing list archives

Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation


From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:38:44 -0400

Good news, bad news.

With an inefficient bash script on an inefficient platform, 120k processes in less than 15minutes.

Thus far, the best I have is less than 10% reduction with barely acceptable aggressiveness.

The distribution is too varied or the level of aggressiveness has to be beyond any subtleties.

Putting this one back on the shelf.

Joe

Michel Py wrote:

I am curious to see how many prefixes aggregation saves.

Michel.



Current thread: