nanog mailing list archives
Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:38:44 -0400
Good news, bad news.With an inefficient bash script on an inefficient platform, 120k processes in less than 15minutes.
Thus far, the best I have is less than 10% reduction with barely acceptable aggressiveness.
The distribution is too varied or the level of aggressiveness has to be beyond any subtleties.
Putting this one back on the shelf. Joe Michel Py wrote:
I am curious to see how many prefixes aggregation saves. Michel.
Current thread:
- fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Christopher Morrow (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Antonio Querubin (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Masataka Ohta (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Mark Leonard (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- RE: fuzzy subnet aggregation Michel Py (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Mark Leonard (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Christopher Morrow (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Mark Leonard (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Nick Morrison via NANOG (Oct 31)
- Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation Joe Maimon (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: fuzzy subnet aggregation Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Oct 31)