nanog mailing list archives
Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:12:01 -0700
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 4:30 PM John R. Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:
Can I summarize the current round of objections to my admittedly off-beat proposal (use basically URLs rather than IP addresses in IP packet src/dest) as: We can't do that! It would require changing something!Nope. You can summarize it as "it doesn't scale", which is what has killed endless numbers of superficially plausible bad ideas.
And Barry's been around long enough to know this. What's up Barry? What's the meta-argument you're trying to make here 'cause "bits is bits" is about as smart as telling a chef that "food is food." Regards, Bill -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment John R. Levine (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment William Herrin (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 10)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Tony Finch (Oct 10)
- RE: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment Kevin Menzel (Oct 10)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Palmer (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 06)