nanog mailing list archives
Re: This DNS over HTTP thing
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 21:36:30 +0900
Tom Hill wrote:
Sure, but the IWF was always intended to stop people accessing paedophilia accidentally.
Then, though you wrote: > It also aides the normalisation of an entirely detestable practice. IWF does not aide so.
look as if you were suggesting that in the UK we are very successful in making money from child pornography *by censoring* child pornography?
"they" means those who are likely to be guests of Epstein. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing, (continued)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Curtis Maurand (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Curtis Maurand (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Jay Ashworth (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Ca By (Oct 02)
- RE: This DNS over HTTP thing Keith Medcalf (Oct 02)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing John Levine (Oct 02)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Tom Hill (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Tom Hill (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Tom Hill (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Oct 02)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing John R. Levine (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 02)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Niels Bakker (Oct 02)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 02)
- RE: This DNS over HTTP thing Keith Medcalf (Oct 02)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Niels Bakker (Oct 03)
- Re: This DNS over HTTP thing Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 03)