nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGP prefix filter list
From: <adamv0025 () netconsultings com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:23:58 +0100
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of Blake Hudson Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 4:35 PM As I recall reading about one vendor's platform (the ASR9k perhaps?) and its TCAM organization process, it stored /32 routes in a dedicated area for faster lookups and did the same for /24 routes.
Yes that was true for the first generation (trident based) line-cards and is no longer the case anymore. adam
Current thread:
- Re: BGP prefix filter list, (continued)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Ahad Aboss (May 16)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Karsten Elfenbein (May 17)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Jon Lewis (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Karsten Elfenbein (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Tom Beecher (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Alejandro Acosta (May 18)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Amir Herzberg (May 18)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Alejandro Acosta (May 18)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Blake Hudson (May 20)
- RE: BGP prefix filter list adamv0025 (May 22)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Blake Hudson (May 22)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Amir Herzberg (May 18)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Jared Brown (May 17)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Jörg Kost (May 17)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Scott Weeks (May 30)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Valdis Klētnieks (May 30)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Scott Weeks (May 30)