Re: is dnswl dead?

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

/subscribe

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:28 AM Jose Manuel Vazquez Castro
<bps.josemanuel11 () gmail com> wrote:
> And check first connectivity ping and telnet tcp ports 22 , 873 to ips destination's from your linuxbox:
>
> Record A rsync2.dnswl.org
> 139.162.192.198
> 142.44.243.216
>
> Or use in the command directly the ip.
> You are behinds a router, proxy , Nat device. May cause problems or deny filter traffic. If share a Wireshark capture 
> will see what's happens  ..
>
> El vie., 3 de mayo de 2019 0:23, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> escribió:
> > % /usr/local/bin/rsync --times rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl/bind-dnswl-nons.zone /var/dns/primary/org.dnswl
> > rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (54)
> > rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at io.c(785) [Receiver=3.1.3]
> >
> > this has been going on for a while.  admins do not respond to email.
> > and yes, i paid.
> >
> > would be a bummer.  was useful.
> >
> > randy