nanog mailing list archives

Re: Advertisement of Equinix Chicago IX Subnet


From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:21:43 +0000

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:36:20PM +0000, Graham Johnston wrote:
This afternoon at around 12:17 central time today we began learning
the subnet for the Equinix IX in Chicago via a transit provider; we
are on the IX as well. The subnet in question is 208.115.136.0/23.
Using stat.ripe.net I can see that this subnet is also being learned
by others, see the snip below. On our network this caused a nasty
routing loop until we figured out what was wrong. My current best
understanding is that because the route was learned via eBGP it
trumped the OSPF learned route. As soon as I filtered the
advertisement from my transit provider everything returned to normal.
What am I doing that isn’t best practices that would have prevented
this?

There is two pieces to help prevent this type of failure:

1/ Equinix should have created a RPKI ROA for 208.115.136.0/23, with an
   Origin ASN of 0 or one of their own ASNs, and a Max Length of 23.

2/ You should implement RPKI based BGP Origin Validation in your network
   and honor those ROAs.

Kind regards,

Job


Current thread: