nanog mailing list archives
Re: QFX5k question
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:52:53 -0700
thanks for quick reply. I forgot to mention, 2 x 10G providers with full routing table on each. thank you... On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:45 PM Paul S. <contact () winterei se> wrote:
QFX5100 as a L3 router + L2 switch performed well for us in the past, I don't see why it'd fall over in <1g traffic now. You should be good to go. On 3/24/2019 04:41 午前, Mehmet Akcin wrote:Hey there, I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a rather quick question. In the past, I often used MX + EX where MX did routing and I connected all uplinks/peering and EX, and EX did switching, i connected my servers to ex. in QFX, I am trying to see if I need EX or not? more importantly (besides from what juniper papers say) are there any known issues people run into for a small scale deployment. (100mbps-1gbps range 1 rack, 20 servers) my plan is to have QFX to it all, but i am worried, if this is too much for QFX, if you have relative experience on this , feel free to let me know thanks in advance mehmet
Current thread:
- QFX5k question Mehmet Akcin (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Paul S. (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Mehmet Akcin (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Niels Bakker (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Sander Steffann (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Mehmet Akcin (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Joseph Jenkins (Mar 23)
- RE: QFX5k question Tony Wicks (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Thomas Bellman (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Denys Fedoryshchenko (Mar 24)
- Re: QFX5k question Paul S. (Mar 23)