nanog mailing list archives

Re: QFX5k question


From: "Paul S." <contact () winterei se>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 04:45:08 +0900

QFX5100 as a L3 router + L2 switch performed well for us in the past, I don't see why it'd fall over in <1g traffic now.

You should be good to go.

On 3/24/2019 04:41 午前, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hey there,

I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a rather quick question.

In the past, I often used MX + EX where MX did routing and I connected all uplinks/peering and EX, and EX did switching, i connected my servers to ex.

in QFX, I am trying to see if I need EX or not? more importantly (besides from what juniper papers say) are there any known issues people run into for a small scale deployment. (100mbps-1gbps range 1 rack, 20 servers)

my plan is to have QFX to it all, but i am worried, if this is too much for QFX, if you have relative experience on this , feel free to let me know

thanks in advance

mehmet



Current thread: