nanog mailing list archives
Re: SLAAC in renumbering events
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 09:51:00 -0500
On 3/8/19 6:32 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
Folks, If you follow the 6man working group of the IETF you may have seen a bunch of emails on this topic, on a thread resulting from an IETF Internet-Draft we published with Jan Žorž about "Reaction of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Renumbering Events" (Available at: https://github.com/fgont/draft-slaac-renum/raw/master/draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum-02.txt )
[...]
We are looking forward to more input on the document (or any comments on the issue being discussed), particularly from operators. So feel free to send your comments on/off list as you prefer
Thanks for bringing this to the attention of operators. Too few IETF documents have operational considerations.
Current thread:
- SLAAC in renumbering events Fernando Gont (Mar 08)
- Re: SLAAC in renumbering events William Allen Simpson (Mar 09)
- Re: SLAAC in renumbering events Masataka Ohta (Mar 09)
- Re: SLAAC in renumbering events William Herrin (Mar 10)
- Re: SLAAC in renumbering events Fernando Gont (Mar 10)