nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 18:42:35 +0200
On 8/Jul/19 18:18, Jared Mauch wrote:
Add bandwidth? QoS is a great tool when you’re constrained and must classify your critical traffic, but it’s not a substitute of getting enough capacity to offices. I have only applied QoS to voice traffic to ensure it gets through, the rest you need to budget for the bandwidth needs of the site. The price of bandwidth likely isn’t insane in your market, but your budget may be.. I’ve found that most places won’t quote you a service for less than $1500 USD MRC. I know you can get the incumbents to often deliver 1G service for $2k/mo in the US (and possibly cheaper). I’ve found a lot of people are still stuck in TDM mentality instead of just getting a 1G/10G service.
In some cases, the motivation for these requirements is fueled by trying to outsmart your competitors. I just don't know of a reliable, contractual way that you can use QoS to say your DIA or IP Transit service is better than that of your competitor. Mark.
Current thread:
- QoS for Office365 Joe Yabuki (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jared Mauch (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 cyrus ramirez via NANOG (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Robert Webb (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jared Mauch (Jul 08)