nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:05:42 +0200
On 9/Jul/19 16:01, Tom Beecher wrote:
But if that language was inserted into the contracts, and you can demonstrably prove it's not being done, enforcing contract terms should always be done. Depending on the strength of the remedy, could have been a lot of free service, enough financial incentive for them to MAKE it work correctly, or leverage to open renegotiations for more favorable terms for you.
Perhaps plenty of service credits. Anything else would just burn too much time on either end for no practical outcome. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 cyrus ramirez via NANOG (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Robert Webb (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joe Yabuki (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Ross Tajvar (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joel Jaeggli (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jay Ford (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Paul Thornton (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brian Knight (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)