nanog mailing list archives
RE: 44/8
From: Jerry Cloe <jerry () jtcloe net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:00:42 -0500
There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to customers and nat's it. -----Original message----- From:Michel Py <michel.py () tsisemi com> Sent:Mon 07-22-2019 05:36 pm Subject:RE: 44/8 To:William Herrin <bill () herrin us>; CC:North American Network Operators‘ Group <nanog () nanog org>; As an extension of RFC1918, it would have solved the questionable and nevertheless widespread squatting of 30/8 and other un-announced DoD blocks because 10/8 is not big enough for some folks. Michel
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) David Conrad (Jul 24)
- Re: Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 24)
- RE: 44/8 Michel Py (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Jerry Cloe (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Ca By (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Michel Py (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Hansen, Christoffer (Jul 24)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Hoppes (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Stephen Satchell (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Owen DeLong (Jul 22)