nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:51:28 -0700
On 7/22/19 12:15 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
1. A lot of existing code base does not know how to handle those addresses and may refuse to route them or will otherwise mishandle them.
Not to mention all the legacy devices that barely do IPv4 at all, and know nothing about IPv6. Legacy devices that are orphaned by their developing companies going out of busiess or dropping all support for the products. I'm looking at YOU, MasterSwitch.
Current thread:
- Ancient history (was Re: 44/8), (continued)
- Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) David Conrad (Jul 24)
- Re: Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 24)
- RE: 44/8 Michel Py (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Jerry Cloe (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Ca By (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Michel Py (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Hansen, Christoffer (Jul 24)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Hoppes (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Stephen Satchell (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) George Herbert (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Ross Tajvar (Jul 22)
- Re: 240/4 (Re: 44/8) Greg Skinner via NANOG (Jul 26)
- Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) Doug Barton (Jul 26)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 26)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) Doug Barton (Jul 26)
- Re: Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 26)