nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:52:43 +0000
On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:46 AM, Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc<mailto:beecher () beecher cc>> wrote: Understood on specifics. But can you comment on the general ARIN policy on the topic? My understanding was that once a legacy resource was transferred , it was permanently removed as a legacy resource. As noted earlier, general ARIN policy is as follows - Those who received IPv4 address blocks by InterNIC (or its predecessors) prior to the inception of ARIN on 22 December 1997 are legacy resource holders, and continue to receive those same registry services for those blocks (Whois, reverse DNS, ability to update) without any need for an agreement with ARIN. This has been provided without any fee to the original registrants (or their legal successors) as recognition of their contributions to the early Internet. Some legacy resource holders opt to sign a “legacy registration services agreement” by which ARIN provides specific and well-defined legal rights to the registrant – this is the same RSA as other ARIN customers, but ARIN caps the total annual maintenance fees that are incurred by legacy resource holders. An RSA is also required to receive services that the community has funded the developed since ARIN’s inception, such as resource certification services. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Re: 44/8 Joe Carroll (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Hoppes (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Tom Beecher (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Tom Beecher (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Tom Beecher (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Tom Beecher (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 William Waites (Jul 18)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Corallo (Jul 18)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Seth Mattinen (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jul 19)