nanog mailing list archives
Re: CloudFlare issues?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 19:14:46 +0200
On 4/Jul/19 17:33, Job Snijders wrote:
At this point in time I think the ideal deployment model is to perform the validation within your administrative domain and run your own validators.
In essence, this is also my thought process. I think Cloudflare are very well-intentioned in making it as painless as possible to support other operators to get RPKI deployed (and more power to them to going to such lengths to do so), but you have to determine whether you are willing to let a service such as this run outside of our domain. Every year, someone asks me whether I'd be willing to outsource my route reflector VNF's to AWS/Azure/e.t.c. My answer to that falls within the realms of handling RPKI for your network :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: CloudFlare issues?, (continued)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Francois Lecavalier (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Job Snijders (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Ben Maddison via NANOG (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- RE: CloudFlare issues? Francois Lecavalier (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Ben Maddison via NANOG (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Job Snijders (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Job Snijders (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Job Snijders (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Francois Lecavalier (Jul 04)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka (Jul 04)