nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:24:29 +0200
On 9/Jul/19 16:16, Saku Ytti wrote:
In previous life working with L3 MPLS VPN with deliveries far exceeding on-net size we bought access from partners and had QoS contracts in place, which were tested and enforced and they worked after some ironing during field trials. Usually contract was bidirectional, with partner also using our network for extending reach of their network, so both had incentive to offer working QoS with network-edge translation of marking.
I think when the partner participates in a private service, end-to-end, there's a higher chance things will work (which I believe is one of the components for Inter-AS l3vpn's and QoS). However, when part of the partner's offering is off-net (especially where off-net = public Internet), much less likely. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joe Yabuki (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Ross Tajvar (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joel Jaeggli (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jay Ford (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Paul Thornton (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brian Knight (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Keith Medcalf (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- RE: QoS for Office365 adamv0025 (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brandon Martin (Jul 09)