nanog mailing list archives

Re: DSLAMs


From: Nick Edwards <nick.z.edwards () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:41:35 +1000

Thanks all for the input, huawei is ruled out due to politics, looks
like for costs we'll stick to the 48 ports from planet



On 1/1/20, Clayton Zekelman <clayton () mnsi net> wrote:

I'd recommend avoiding the C7 - ADSL2+
performance on them isn't the best.   Look for
something with a Broadcom chipset.  Even an old
Calix B6 would be better than C7 - although the
B6 gear is getting old, and reliability is
sketchy.  The power converter modules on board seem to go.

At 01:51 PM 31/12/2019, Shawn L via NANOG wrote:

That's a tough one.  48 port dslams with
internal splitters are easy.  When you're
looking for more density you're almost always
looking at external splitter shelves.  Could
also look at the calix c7 platform -- tons
around on the used market -- but then again, no splitters.




-----Original Message-----
From: "Dennis Lundström" <dennis () umnum ca>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 12:32pm
To: "Nick Edwards" <nick.z.edwards () gmail com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: DSLAMs

Found this one:
<ftp://ftp2.dlink.com/SUPPORT/End_of_Life_Product_List_091519.pdf>ftp://ftp2.dlink.com/SUPPORT/End_of_Life_Product_List_091519.pdf
Stating EOL 2015-04-14 for HW revision A1.
—Dennis

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:27 Nick Edwards
<<mailto:nick.z.edwards () gmail com>nick.z.edwards () gmail com> wrote:
Howdy y'all

Chasing some info, does dlink still sell DAS4672 - 672 port adsl2+ dslams?

after simple IP based  units with pppoe pass through.
We could buy a bunch of planet 48 ports, which we used before, but we
hoping someone still puts out high capacity (320 plus port) units with
inbuilt pots splitters

thanks

--

Clayton Zekelman
Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
3363 Tecumseh Rd. E
Windsor, Ontario
N8W 1H4

tel. 519-985-8410
fax. 519-985-8409


Current thread: