nanog mailing list archives
Re: 5G roadblock: labor
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:48:34 -0800
On 12/30/19 2:39 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
It'd be nice to see what benefits 5g really has for carriers and consumers/users... It looks, to me, like a bunch of the 5g hype is really: "uhm, we need to sell these carriers on the G++ ... spin up the hype machine about speed!" never mind the cost to deploy, range of deployment, changes in handset/radio gear / etc... more $ to the vendors!
You know that there is a massive amount of hype going on when they tie IoT to why it's definitely most certainly needed the mostest. I mean, your average IoT gadget is going to consume exactly how much bandwidth? And why on earth would I want to deploy using cellular when my router can have a zigby port and send it using my home connection?
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor, (continued)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor Marshall, Quincy (Dec 30)
- [OFF-TOPIC detour] Re: 5G roadblock: labor Karl Auer (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Brian J. Murrell (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor Keith Medcalf (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Christopher Morrow (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor Keith Medcalf (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Ca By (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Christopher Morrow (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Ca By (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Brandon Martin (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 30)
- Message not available
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 30)
- Message not available
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Dec 30)