nanog mailing list archives
Re: 5G roadblock: labor
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:56:43 +0200
On 30/Dec/19 16:23, Matt Hoppes wrote:
We saw this with Femtocells. Why build the network when the end user will build it with their broadband connection?
My point exactly. It's sneaky and, well, genius, at the same time.
With 5G - if I need fiber to the pole already and the pole has to be within. Few hundred feet of the end user, why not just deploy fiber to the home?
My point exactly. IMHO, 5G development didn't take into account the pervasiveness of fibre to the business, and the home.
Do I really need a gigabit per second on my mobile device?.
As Sean Connery's character said to Catherine Zeta-Jones' one in "Entrapment": "What can you do with seven billion that you can't do with four?" Mark.
Current thread:
- 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matt Hoppes (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor jdambrosia (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Dec 31)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matthew Petach (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor Keith Medcalf (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Brandon Martin (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matt Hoppes (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Ben Cannon (Dec 30)