nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE our of IPv4
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:56:08 +1100
On 4 Dec 2019, at 09:51, Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> wrote: On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:47:25 +1100, Mark Andrews said:Why not use someone else’s IPv4 addresses? Really. What is wrong with using someone else’s IPv4 addresses if it achieves the need? As far as I can tell nothing.Other than the fact that a /24 is being advertised out of one AS and it's part of some other AS's /14 and looks suspiciously like a hijack? And we currently don't deal well with identifying and preventing true hijacks and mess up false positives a lot of the time?
I’m curious if you actually read the example of use of another’s IPv4 address before starting talking about hijacking addresses? Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- US Broadband IPv6 (Re: RIPE out of IPv4), (continued)
- US Broadband IPv6 (Re: RIPE out of IPv4) Jared Mauch (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Willy Manga (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Randy Bush (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Aled Morris via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Large Hadron Collider (Dec 05)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Brandon Martin (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Message not available
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fred Baker (Dec 03)