nanog mailing list archives

Re: RIPE our of IPv4

From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 17:51:28 -0500

On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:47:25 +1100, Mark Andrews said:

Why not use someone elseâs IPv4 addresses?  Really.  What is wrong with using
someone elseâs IPv4 addresses if it achieves the need?  As far as I can tell
nothing.


Other than the fact that a /24 is being advertised out of one AS and it's part of
some other AS's /14 and looks suspiciously like a hijack?  And we currently don't
deal well with identifying and preventing true hijacks and mess up false positives
a lot of the time?

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: RIPE our of IPv4, (continued)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Justin Streiner (Dec 01)
  - US Broadband IPv6 (Re: RIPE out of IPv4) Jared Mauch (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Willy Manga (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 02)
  - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 02)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Randy Bush (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Aled Morris via NANOG (Dec 04)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Large Hadron Collider (Dec 05)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Brandon Martin (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
    - Message not available
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
    - Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fred Baker (Dec 03)